linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc-bfin: add missing "return 0" in new alarm func> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:26:24AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110319011527.GA1972@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:15:30 +0800
From:	Harry Wei <jiaweiwei.xiyou@...il.com>
To:	vapier@...too.org
Cc:	john.stultz@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-bfin: add missing "return 0" in new alarm func> On
 Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:26:24AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:

	On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:10:14AM +0800, jiaweiwei wrote:
> 
> >> the end leading to the build warning:
> >>        drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c: In function 'bfin_rtc_alarm_irq_enable':
> >>        drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c:253: warning: control reaches end of
> >> non-void function
> >>
> >> CC: stable@...nel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Acked-by: Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c |    2 ++
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c
> >> index 17971d9..0e61e2d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c
> >> @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ static int bfin_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device
> >> *dev, unsigned int enabled)
> >>                bfin_rtc_int_set_alarm(rtc);
> >>        else
> >>                bfin_rtc_int_clear(~(RTC_ISTAT_ALARM |
> >> RTC_ISTAT_ALARM_DAY));
> >> +
> >> +       return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static int bfin_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.1
> >>
>alarm_irq_enable function forgot to add a "return 0" to
>> the end leading to the build warning:
>>       drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c: In function 'bfin_rtc_alarm_irq_enable':
>>       drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c:253: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>
>   I am sure we should give a return-value
> but whether it is '0'? Maybe it should return
> other value.
>   Can you give some explanations for yours.

>read the interface.c code ... this func returns 0 on "success".  i
>dont know what other possible value this could return.
Oh, it is true.

Thanks.
Best Regards.
Harry Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/