[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110321125233.GA28098@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:52:34 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <patches@...aro.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make sdhci device drivers self registered
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:39:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
Hi Arnd,
> The changes you make look very nice, great work there!
>
> I think the split of the series into five patches is not ideal
> because you have more interdependencies than necessary, and it's
> not clear that the series can be safely bisected, especially
> with the way you do all the Kconfig/Makefile updates at the
> end.
>
> A nicer way to partition the series would be
>
> 1. Add sdhci_pltfm_init helper
> 2-5. Convert each of the users, including the respective
> Kconfig/Makefile changes
> 6. remove obsolete code from sdhci-pltfm.c
>
> As I said, that's just a detail and the end result is the same.
> If you don't get any other feedback and Chris is happy with the
> changes, I wouldn't expect you to reshuffle all the patches just
> for this.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
Actually, I knew there should be better partition of the patch set,
and it just did not come into my mind :) You suggestion does look
better. I would take it in the next spin.
Thanks for the suggestion.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists