[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52FD@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:19:44 -0400
From: Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@...sigma.com>
To: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Trammell Hudson <Trammell.Hudson@...sigma.com>,
Martin Bligh <Martin.Bligh@...sigma.com>,
Stephen Degler <Stephen.Degler@...sigma.com>,
Christos Zoulas <Christos.Zoulas@...sigma.com>
Subject: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38
This message was originally posted to the XFS mailing list, but received no responses. Thus, I am sending it to LKML on the advice of Martin.
Using the attached program, we are able to reproduce this bug reliably.
$ make vmtest
$ ./vmtest /xfs/hugefile.dat $(( 16 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 )) # vmtest <path_to_file> <size_in_bytes>
/xfs/hugefile.dat: mapped 17179869184 bytes in 33822066943 ticks
749660: avg 13339 max 234667 ticks
371945: avg 26885 max 281616 ticks
---
At this point, we see the following on the console:
[593492.694806] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
[593506.724367] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
[593524.837717] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
[593556.742386] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
This is the same message presented in
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=410
We started testing with 2.6.38-rc7 and have seen this bug through to the .0 release. This does not appear to be present in 2.6.33, but we have not done testing in between. We have tested with ext4 and do not encounter this bug.
CONFIG_XFS_FS=y
CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA=y
CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_XFS_RT=y
# CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_VXFS_FS is not set
Here is the stack from the process:
[<ffffffff81357553>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff812ddf1e>] xfs_ilock+0x7e/0x110
[<ffffffff8130132f>] __xfs_get_blocks+0x8f/0x4e0
[<ffffffff813017b1>] xfs_get_blocks+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff8114ba3e>] __block_write_begin+0x1ee/0x5b0
[<ffffffff8114be9d>] block_page_mkwrite+0x9d/0xf0
[<ffffffff81307e05>] xfs_vm_page_mkwrite+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff810f2ddb>] do_wp_page+0x54b/0x820
[<ffffffff810f347c>] handle_pte_fault+0x3cc/0x820
[<ffffffff810f5145>] handle_mm_fault+0x175/0x2f0
[<ffffffff8102e399>] do_page_fault+0x159/0x470
[<ffffffff816cf6cf>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
# uname -a
Linux testhost 2.6.38 #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Mar 18 15:00:59 GMT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Please let me know if additional information is required.
Thanks!
Sean
View attachment "vmtest.c" of type "text/plain" (2185 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists