[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=o3fN+aXSodZL_MyDnFczaXCmOjFwReD1jDZQP@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:01:14 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pstore: Don't use persistent store for normal shutdown
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com> wrote:
> I think we should introduce a tunable parameter specifying how much data stores into persistent
> ram when normal shutdown happens.
Currently pstore has a /sys/fs/pstore hook to change the amount of data saved.
Christoph Hellwig convinced me that a mount option would be better, so there
is a patch pending to change this:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=130048763005234&w=2
I can add more options easily (apart from thinking of good names for
the options :-)
But this is beginning to feel over engineered ... I think I'll wait to see
if there are some other (better) ideas before I rush to do this.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists