lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110321231050.942106776@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:09:42 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Antony Pavlov <antony@...si.msk.ru>,
	Guillaume LECERF <glecerf@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
Subject: [02/44] mtd: jedec_probe: Change variable name from cfi_p to cfi

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Antony Pavlov <antony@...si.msk.ru>

commit efba2e313ea1b1bd69a7c4659263becf43bb1adc upstream.

In the following commit, we'll need to use the CMD() macro in order to
fix the initialisation of the sector_erase_cmd field. That requires the
local variable to be called 'cfi', so change it first in a simple patch.

Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antony@...si.msk.ru>
Acked-by: Guillaume LECERF <glecerf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c
@@ -1923,14 +1923,14 @@ static void jedec_reset(u32 base, struct
 }
 
 
-static int cfi_jedec_setup(struct cfi_private *p_cfi, int index)
+static int cfi_jedec_setup(struct cfi_private *cfi, int index)
 {
 	int i,num_erase_regions;
 	uint8_t uaddr;
 
-	if (! (jedec_table[index].devtypes & p_cfi->device_type)) {
+	if (!(jedec_table[index].devtypes & cfi->device_type)) {
 		DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "Rejecting potential %s with incompatible %d-bit device type\n",
-		      jedec_table[index].name, 4 * (1<<p_cfi->device_type));
+		      jedec_table[index].name, 4 * (1<<cfi->device_type));
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1938,27 +1938,27 @@ static int cfi_jedec_setup(struct cfi_pr
 
 	num_erase_regions = jedec_table[index].nr_regions;
 
-	p_cfi->cfiq = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cfi_ident) + num_erase_regions * 4, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!p_cfi->cfiq) {
+	cfi->cfiq = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cfi_ident) + num_erase_regions * 4, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cfi->cfiq) {
 		//xx printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: kmalloc failed for CFI ident structure\n", map->name);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	memset(p_cfi->cfiq,0,sizeof(struct cfi_ident));
+	memset(cfi->cfiq, 0, sizeof(struct cfi_ident));
 
-	p_cfi->cfiq->P_ID = jedec_table[index].cmd_set;
-	p_cfi->cfiq->NumEraseRegions = jedec_table[index].nr_regions;
-	p_cfi->cfiq->DevSize = jedec_table[index].dev_size;
-	p_cfi->cfi_mode = CFI_MODE_JEDEC;
+	cfi->cfiq->P_ID = jedec_table[index].cmd_set;
+	cfi->cfiq->NumEraseRegions = jedec_table[index].nr_regions;
+	cfi->cfiq->DevSize = jedec_table[index].dev_size;
+	cfi->cfi_mode = CFI_MODE_JEDEC;
 
 	for (i=0; i<num_erase_regions; i++){
-		p_cfi->cfiq->EraseRegionInfo[i] = jedec_table[index].regions[i];
+		cfi->cfiq->EraseRegionInfo[i] = jedec_table[index].regions[i];
 	}
-	p_cfi->cmdset_priv = NULL;
+	cfi->cmdset_priv = NULL;
 
 	/* This may be redundant for some cases, but it doesn't hurt */
-	p_cfi->mfr = jedec_table[index].mfr_id;
-	p_cfi->id = jedec_table[index].dev_id;
+	cfi->mfr = jedec_table[index].mfr_id;
+	cfi->id = jedec_table[index].dev_id;
 
 	uaddr = jedec_table[index].uaddr;
 
@@ -1966,8 +1966,8 @@ static int cfi_jedec_setup(struct cfi_pr
 	   our brains explode when we see the datasheets talking about address
 	   lines numbered from A-1 to A18. The CFI table has unlock addresses
 	   in device-words according to the mode the device is connected in */
-	p_cfi->addr_unlock1 = unlock_addrs[uaddr].addr1 / p_cfi->device_type;
-	p_cfi->addr_unlock2 = unlock_addrs[uaddr].addr2 / p_cfi->device_type;
+	cfi->addr_unlock1 = unlock_addrs[uaddr].addr1 / cfi->device_type;
+	cfi->addr_unlock2 = unlock_addrs[uaddr].addr2 / cfi->device_type;
 
 	return 1; 	/* ok */
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ