[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110322103735.GD4448@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:37:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: fix common misspellings
* Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com> wrote:
> They were generated by 'codespell' and then manually reviewed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 8 ++++----
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/string.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Hm, half of these do not apply anymore.
Since they are auto-generated, mind sending one large spelling fixes patch to
Linus (for the whole kernel), at the end of the merge window, instead of these
zillions of small commits which just clutter the patchflow? That makes it a
heck of a lot easier to verify and handle for everyone involved.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists