linux-kernel - [PATCH 8/8] fs: pull inode->i_lock up out of writeback_single

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1300793023-3775-9-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:23:43 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] fs: pull inode->i_lock up out of writeback_single_inode

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

First thing we do in writeback_single_inode() is take the i_lock and
the last thing we do is drop it. A caller already holds the i_lock,
so pull the i_lock out of writeback_single_inode() to reduce the
round trips on this lock during inode writeback.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index ed80065..b5ed541 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -332,9 +332,9 @@ static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 /*
- * Write out an inode's dirty pages.  Called under inode_wb_list_lock.  Either
- * the caller has an active reference on the inode or the inode has I_WILL_FREE
- * set.
+ * Write out an inode's dirty pages.  Called under inode_wb_list_lock and
+ * inode->i_lock.  Either the caller has an active reference on the inode or
+ * the inode has I_WILL_FREE set.
  *
  * If `wait' is set, wait on the writeout.
  *
@@ -349,7 +349,9 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	unsigned dirty;
 	int ret;
 
-	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	assert_spin_locked(&inode_wb_list_lock);
+	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
+
 	if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
 		WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & (I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING)));
 	else
@@ -365,7 +367,6 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 		 * completed a full scan of b_io.
 		 */
 		if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) {
-			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 			requeue_io(inode);
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -456,7 +457,6 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 		}
 	}
 	inode_sync_complete(inode);
-	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 		}
 
 		__iget(inode);
-		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
 		pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
 		writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
@@ -555,6 +554,7 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 			 */
 			redirty_tail(inode);
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		spin_unlock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
 		iput(inode);
 		cond_resched();
@@ -1309,7 +1309,9 @@ int write_inode_now(struct inode *inode, int sync)
 
 	might_sleep();
 	spin_lock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	ret = writeback_single_inode(inode, &wbc);
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
 	if (sync)
 		inode_sync_wait(inode);
@@ -1333,7 +1335,9 @@ int sync_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	int ret;
 
 	spin_lock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	ret = writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&inode_wb_list_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/