lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110322195331.GY22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:53:31 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	apw@...onical.com, nbd@...nwrt.org, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v7] overlay filesystem - request for inclusion

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:43:17PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> In copy up it does:
> 
> -> lock parent on upper
>   -> lock child on upper
> 
> So a setattr with copy up would go like this:
> 
> -> lock child on overlayfs
>   -> lock parent on upper
>      ->lock child on upper
>   -> lock child on upper
> 
> > > Protection is exactly as for userspace callers.  AFAICT.
> > 
> > Pardon?  You traverse the chain of ancestors; fine, but who says it stays
> > anywhere near being relevant as you go?
> 
> Not quite sure I understand.
> 
> There are no assumptions about locks in overlayfs keeping anything
> relevant in upper/lower fs.  Everything is re-checked and re-locked on
> the upper layer before proceeding with the rename.

Proceeding with rename is not interesting; proceeding with copyup is.

Who said that by the time we get to copy_up_locked you will still have
dentry (and upper) match lowerpath?  Or that ->d_parent on overlay and
on upper will change in sync, for that matter - there are two d_move()
calls involved...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ