[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D89BDE2.9040606@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:01:14 +0530
From: Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: arjan@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 3/5] cpuidle: default idle driver for x86
On 03/23/2011 08:43 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> Why is this patch a step forward?
Hi Len,
I have basically moved the code for arch default and mwait
idle from arch/x86/kernel/process.c to a driver. This was
suggested by Venki (https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/460)
as part of pm_idle cleanup and direct call of
cpuidle_idle_call(). There is not much new code here.
>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += default_driver.o
>
> BTW, that's a pretty generic name for an x86 specific idle driver...
>
> I think that on builds that support intel_idle and acpi_idle,
> everything in this file will be unused, unless somebody uses some
> debugging cmdline params that should have been deleted ages ago.
Yes, I agree that the name has to be x86 specific. I think the
routines would be used for pre-nehalem architectures that use
arch default or mwait.
Thanks,
-Trinabh
>
> thanks,
> Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists