[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110323105906.GA29657@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:59:06 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make sure the FADT is at least rev 2 before
using the reset register
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01:50AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER))
> return;
>
> For it not to be redundant, there would have to be FADTs out there
> of revision 1 that set what was then a reserved bit in the flags.
Yes. You trust them not to have set reserved flags to random garbage?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists