[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300889182.1968.13.camel@dan>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:06:22 -0400
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, security@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sound/oss: remove offset from load_patch callbacks
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 14:59 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:47:22 -0400,
> Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> > --- a/sound/oss/midi_synth.c
> > +++ b/sound/oss/midi_synth.c
> > @@ -508,16 +506,15 @@ midi_synth_load_patch(int dev, int format, const char __user *addr,
> > * been transferred already.
> > */
> >
> > - if(copy_from_user(&((char *) &sysex)[offs], &(addr)[offs], hdr_size - offs))
> > + if (copy_from_user(&sysex, addr, hdr_size))
>
> Please correct the comment in the above as well.
> With this change, the transfer is no longer partial.
Will do.
>
> > --- a/sound/oss/opl3.c
> > +++ b/sound/oss/opl3.c
> ...
> > @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int opl3_load_patch(int dev, int format, const char __user *addr,
> > * What the fuck is going on here? We leave junk in the beginning
> > * of ins and then check the field pretty close to that beginning?
> > */
> > - if(copy_from_user(&((char *) &ins)[offs], addr + offs, sizeof(ins) - offs))
> > + if (copy_from_user(&ins, addr, sizeof(ins)))
>
> Ditto.
Likewise.
>
> > return -EFAULT;
> >
> > if (ins.channel < 0 || ins.channel >= SBFM_MAXINSTR)
> > diff --git a/sound/oss/sequencer.c b/sound/oss/sequencer.c
> > index 5ea1098..2e842cb 100644
> > --- a/sound/oss/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sound/oss/sequencer.c
> > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ int sequencer_write(int dev, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, int coun
> > return -ENXIO;
> >
> > fmt = (*(short *) &event_rec[0]) & 0xffff;
> > - err = synth_devs[dev]->load_patch(dev, fmt, buf, p + 4, c, 0);
> > + err = synth_devs[dev]->load_patch(dev, fmt, buf, c, 0);
>
> The address must be "buf + p + 4" instead of "buf", when you omit the
> offset argument.
>
Are you sure? Previously, the copy of the header was from (buf + p + 4)
to (dst + p + 4) with length (hdr_size - (p + 4)), and now the copy is
from buf to dst with length hdr_size. If I do as you suggest, then the
copy will be from (buf + p + 4) to dst for the header.
-Dan
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists