linux-kernel - Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D8A20F8.2080409@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:34:00 +0000
From:	Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, roger.quadros@...ia.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

On 03/23/2011 04:22 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:

>>    In case of smsc95xx, we *know* that it's ethernet and not two-host,
>>    there is no reasonable doubt about this. The code almost makes sense
>>    on generic cdc devices, but not for anything else.
>
> Ok, let's fix it up and see who complains :)

OK... what approach are you alright with being used to signal the fix up 
selection of interface name in usbnet?  Flag set in async platform_data 
from board definition file as in the existing tested patches is OK?

-Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/