[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110323165907.GE12003@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:59:07 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
vda.linux@...glemail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
indan@....nu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] job control: Notify the real parent of job control
events regardless of ptrace
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Ooh, on a related note, we probably want to change
> > do_notify_parent_cldstop() too. tsk->group_leader->real_parent is
> > used as the delivery target when !@..._ptracer. This is the same with
> > tsk->real_parent and the code has been like this for a long time but
> > is a bit confusing.
>
> Yes, although in this case we do
>
> tsk = tsk->group_leader;
> parent = tsk->real_parent;
>
> We need to change tsk to report the correct si_pid. But we could do
>
> parent = tsk->real_parent;
> tsk = tsk->group_leader;
>
> not sure this looks less confusing.
They themselves are about the same but the inconsistency with the
is_real_parent() test is a bit confusing, I think. If we're testing
for duplicates by testing ->real_parent against ->parent then the
actual delivery should be also be using ->real_parent and ->parent,
so...
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists