[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8A4D82.7020103@dualc.maya.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:44:02 +0100
From: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...enet.de>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: intel_ips produces constant load of 1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:15:57 +0100
> Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...enet.de> wrote:
>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:04 -0700
>>> Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> ps aux | grep ips
>>>>> root 593 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 17:20 0:00
>>>>> [ips-adjust]
>>>>> root 594 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D 17:20 0:00
>>>>> [ips-monitor]
>>>>>
>>>>> If the module isn't loaded, the load of the machine in idle mode is 0 as
>>>>> expected.
>>>>
>>>> This is a reporting problem, and probably due to the schedule() call
>>>> and associated task state in the ips-monitor thread. I thought setting
>>>> the task state to interruptible would prevent this, but it seems like
>>>> it's not enough for the deferrable on-stack timers?
>>>>
>>>> At any rate, it's not actually causing increased CPU usage, so you can
>>>> safely ignore it until we have a fix.
>>>
>>> Oops, one task uses interruptible correctly, but the monitor thread
>>> doesn't.
>>>
>>> Does this patch fix your load average?
>>
>> Which patch? I can't see any patch :-).
>>
>
> Did I forget to paste it? See below.
>
Uuuups - it was below the sig, which I switch off :-). Found it. Will
test it tomorrow.
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists