[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPKEODvp3MmYmFrmEYSbAPr1b4dTq6fDHWAEsD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:41:25 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct
reclaim path completely
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> For example, In 4G desktop system.
>>> 32M full scanning and fail to reclaim a page.
>>> It's under 1% coverage.
>>
>> ?? I'm sorry. I haven't catch it.
>> Where 32M come from?
>
> (1<<12) * 4K + (1<<11) + 4K + .. (1 << 0) + 4K in shrink_zones.
Stupid me.
Sorry. my calculation is totally wrong.
Your explanation was perfect
Okay. I don't have any objection to your solution.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists