[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110324080326.GA30812@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:03:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up
> those range on system that have lots of RAM.
>
> Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation.
>
> So We could remove those not needed code now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 64 ---------------------------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1
> 3 files changed, 67 deletions(-)
Cc:-ing Jesse - i suspect this should be handled by the PCI tree.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists