[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103241315.34722.linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:15:34 +0100
From: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] APM: delete APM in Linux-2.6.40
On Thursday 24 March 2011, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 8 ++++++++
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index b3f35e5..2a03c46 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -619,3 +619,11 @@ Why: The original implementation of memsw feature
> enabled by Who: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
>
> ----------------------------
> +
> +What: CONFIG_APM
> +When: 2.6.40
> +Why: Microsoft deleted APM from Windows as of Vista in in 2006.
> + It now seems more than safe that the latest Linux Kernel be APM-free.
> + The vintage laptops supporting APM are now difficult to find,
> + making it problatic to maintain this code.
> +Who: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Please don't turn Linux into second Windows. If you don't want APM in the
kernel, just don't compile it. There are many people using older systems with
APM - and most of them wouldn't oppose to this removal as they don't even
know about it.
--
Ondrej Zary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists