lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110324134142.GB27124@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:42 +0100
From:	Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@...tralsolutions.com>,
	sachi@...tralsolutions.com,
	davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stalin Srinivasan <stalin.s@...tralsolutions.com>,
	nsekhar@...com, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	m-watkins@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] mfd: add pruss mfd driver.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 03/24/2011 02:16 PM, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > With make C=1 I am receiving some warnings such as:
> > 
> > warning: cast removes address space of expression
> > drivers/mfd/da8xx_pru.c:61:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1
> > (different base types)
> > drivers/mfd/da8xx_pru.c:61:17:    expected void const volatile [noderef]
> > <asn:2>*<noident>
> > drivers/mfd/da8xx_pru.c:61:17:    got int
> > drivers/mfd/da8xx_pru.c:66:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 1
> > (different address spaces)
> 
> (Re)read the warning carefully:
> 
> You have to fix drivers/mfd/da8xx_pru.c, the first argument should be
> __void iomem *, not an int. Fix the type of the first argument. Don't
> use any casts at all, follow all warnings, eventually you will have void
> __iomem * (or struct * instead of void *) and no warnings.
> 
> > I can remove all of these by casting to (__force void  __iomem *) but is
> > this correct.
> 
> No evil casts, please :)
In addition, I learned that if a driver is not bound to a specific architecture,
you better use ioread/iowrite & friends, rather that accessing the iomemory
directly.
> 
Kurt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ