[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <hvc-kick-notask@mdm.bga.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:58:04 -0600
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
greg@...ah.com, Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised
[removed stable list from discussion]
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:29:58 -0000, Amit Shah wrote:
> hvc_open() can be called without having any backing device. This
> results in a call to hvc_kick() which calls wake_up_process on a NULL
> pointer.
How is hvc_open called without a hvc_driver registered to the tty layer?
> Ensure hvc is initialised by checking for a non-NULL hvc_task
> before waking up the hvc thread.
No if the task is missing the subsystem is really stuck. Put a check
in open and refuse to open.
>
> This was found by an autotest run for virtio_console without having a
> console backend.
>
stack trace please
> CC: stable@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
> index e9cba13..b2cb5cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hvc_instantiate);
> /* Wake the sleeping khvcd */
> void hvc_kick(void)
> {
> + if (!hvc_task)
> + return;
> +
> hvc_kicked = 1;
> wake_up_process(hvc_task);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists