[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8B7570.40101@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:46:40 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of a counter
before test
On 03/24/2011 07:33 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2011 11:48 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don, I've added yours SOB, ok? (The patch is attached to avoid
>>>> space/tabs problem
>>>> due to web-mail client)
>>>
>>> The patch lacks a proper description about the motivation and effects of the
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>
>> Ingo, does this one looks better?
>>
>> ---
>> From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of MSR register to catch unflagged overflows
>>
>> The read of a proper MSR register was missed so instead of a counter the
>> configration register is tested (it has ARCH_P4_UNFLAGGED_BIT always cleared)
>> and unflagged overflows never have been catched. Fix it by reading a proper
>> MSR register.
>
> So what effect does this have on the regular perf user? Please try to describe
> the real-life effect of the bug/problem fixed here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Unflagged overflows never have been catched due to missed read of a register which
is to signalize about it, and as result unknown nmi may happen leading to
"Dazen and confused" message. That is what supposed to be in changelog?
--
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists