[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110324172653.GA28507@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:26:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, npiggin@...nel.dk,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v2.6.39-rc1
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >> FYI, some sort of boot crash has snuck upstream in the last 24 hours:
> >>
> >> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff87ffc147e020
> >> IP: [<ffffffff811aa762>] this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu+0x2/0x1c
> >
> > Hmmm.. This is the fallback code for the case that the processor does not
> > support cmpxchg16b.
>
> How does alternative_io() work? Does it require
> alternative_instructions() to be executed. If so, the fallback code
> won't be active when we enter kmem_cache_init(). Is there any reason
> check_bugs() is called so late during boot? Can we do something like
> the totally untested attached patch?
Does the config i sent you boot on your box? I think the bug is pretty generic
and should trigger on any box.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists