[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=c+664qQqiKOLmvdFScizUC7+88SrCx7WJnp0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:00 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 3/4] drivers/otp: allow an ioctl to be specified
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:21, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Some drivers may need an ioctl method to provide device specific control
> such as blackfin for providing locking. Regions can specify an ioctl to
> be used but this field method is optional.
shouldnt this just be squashed into patch 1 since you havent merged
any of this yet ?
> +static long otp_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct otp_region *region = filp->private_data;
> + long ret = -ENOTTY;
> +
> + if (down_interruptible(&otp_sem))
> + return -ERESTARTSYS;
> +
> + if (region->ops->ioctl)
> + ret = region->ops->ioctl(region, cmd, arg);
> +
> + up(&otp_sem);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
the existence check can be pulled out of the locking
long ret;
if (!region->ops->ioctl)
return -ENOTTY;
if (down_interruptible(&otp_sem))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
ret = region->ops->ioctl(region, cmd, arg);
up(&otp_sem);
return ret;
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists