[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110324185620.GA15807@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:56:20 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
andy.green@...aro.org, Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>,
Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arnd@...db.de,
roger.quadros@...ia.com, greg@...ah.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:12:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:32:28PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>
> > It's a different matter that DT has many hearts to win(at least in ARM
> > Linux)
> > So, perhaps the answer to Q(a) is - Yes.
>
> It's not really a question of hearts to win. Even for people who are
> fully won over the implementation just isn't there in mainline and it's
> not clear when it'll be delivered. Right now device tree can only be
> used on SPARC, PowerPC and (I beleive) some x86 platforms.
MIPS and Microblaze too plus out-of-tree NIOS.
Regardless, I agree 100%. This isn't (er, shouldn't be) a device tree
debate. The problem does need to be solved for existing platforms.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists