lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:34:41 +0100
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 - early Oops

On 2011.03.24 at 19:58 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-03-24 19:54, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.03.24 at 19:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 2011-03-24 19:36, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On 2011-03-24 19:30, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >>>> On 2011.03.24 at 14:43 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the main pull request for the block IO layer and friends for
> >>>>> 2.6.39.
> >>>>
> >>>> This merge results in an early oops on my system (amd64, xfs).
> >>>> See the attached photo.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Auch. Can you ensure that you have CONFIG_DEBUGINFO=y in your .config
> >>> and then do:
> >>>
> >>> $ gdb vmlinux
> >>> ...
> >>> l *cfq_insert_request+0x32
> >>>
> >>> and send that output?
> >>
> >> I took a closer look at the oops, and it most likely looks like q ==
> >> NULL (offset 0x18 == q->elevator). You left out the Code part, so I
> >> can't verify that for certain. Which makes very little sense. I take it
> >> this is 100% reproducible? When you send the gdb output, please also
> >> attach your .config.
> > 
> > Yes, it's 100% reproducible here. My .config follows:
> 
> Can you try this patch and see if it makes a difference?

There's no patch ;-)

> If you boot without the patch and add elevator=noop, does it then work?

It works insofar as the Oops is gone. But my xfs partitions apparently
still get corrupted (I had to run xfs_repair on several of them, because
they would not mount otherwise).

-- 
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ