[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300941210.2402.414.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:33:30 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kdump: Allow shrinking of kdump region to be
overridden
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 03:10 +0000, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:22:19 +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> >> Okay, but with this patch applied, we will just ignore rtas region,
> >> right?
> > Correct.
> >> Thus, when I echo 0 to free all the 128M crashkernel memory, the final
> >> result will be 32M left, which means crash_size will still show 32M.
> >> This looks odd.
> >>
> >> How about skipping the 32M as a whole? I mean once the region being
> >> freed has overlap with this rtas region, skip the whole rtas region,
> >> and let crash_size
> >> show 0?
> > The existing code from crash_shrink_memory() function reduces the crash
> > size to 0 when echo'ed 0. I did test this patchset and verified that
> > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size show 0 value.
>
> Oh, ok.
>
> Acked-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
So Eric, what's the right approach to get that merged ? This is a bug
gating an important delivery for us, and the patch doesn't appear
terribly invasive ? :-)
I can send it to Linus myself if you prefer and give me your Ack.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists