linux-kernel - Re: Tests for cpusets and cgroup performance measurement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:16:27 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Tests for cpusets and cgroup performance measurement

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Jaswinder Singh
<jaswinderlinux@...il.com> wrote:
> "Jobs on larger NUMA systems may see a performance boost if jobs can be
> intelligently assigned to specific CPUs. Jobs may perform better if
> striped across physical processors, or contained within the fewest
> number of memory controllers."
>
> I am curious and want to try some simple tests so that I can see the
> performance improvement by using cpusets on my PCs.
>
> Can you suggest some tests so that I can study them.

Not particularly - I've never been involved in optimizing apps on
large NUMA systems. Our uses of NUMA at Google have all involved
faked-NUMA nodes, assigning nodes to jobs to provide crude memory
limits.

I suspect that there aren't very many "simple" tests out there. Google
search for [hpc numa tuning] turns up a few likely pages that might
have pointers to suitable applications.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/