[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300949139.30136.1543.camel@debian>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:45:39 +0800
From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"jaxboe@...ionio.com" <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs
machine
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 01:46 +0800, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
>
> > Jeff, I suppose the log files of fs_mark processes are on the same
> > device as the test directory, aren't they - that might explain the
> > flusher thread doing IO? The patch below
>
> No. My test environments are sane. The file system is on a completely
> separate disk and it is unmounted and remounted in between each run.
> That should take care of any lost flushes.
Jeff, why not give a try with Jan's fs_mark patch? Maybe the result show
something change. :)
>
> Did you receive my last couple of private emails commenting on the trace
> data?
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists