[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301045882.3268.2.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:38:02 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, tee@....com,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation in
test_and_set_bit_lock if possible
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 06:47 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> I tried many different changes in BIOS and all failed (the machine is
> damn slow at boot, this takes age).
I even tried on a more recent hardware (ProLiant BL460c G7)
BIOS : Version: I27 Release Date: 09/30/2010
[ 0.021849] CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz stepping 02
[ 0.123904] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Westmere events, Broken BIOS detected, using software events only.
[ 0.124125] [Firmware Bug]: the BIOS has corrupted hw-PMU resources (MSR 38d is 330)
I guess I'll have to patch my kernel, I doubt HP will make any change in this area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists