linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mutex: Apply adaptive spinning on mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110325102912.GB31903@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:29:12 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mutex: Apply adaptive spinning on mutex_trylock()


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:18:16AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > NOT-Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > 
> > s/NOT-// ?
> > 
> 
> Perhaps because it is still in RFC context?

Ok, i guess i was a bit too cryptic about it: the discussion was in support of 
the changes so i asked Tejun above to send a SOB version and did that in a 
geeky way.

And paid my price for the shortcut: had two write two other emails about it 
already ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/