[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301055698.2250.198.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:21:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: deadlock caused by printk
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 20:15 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These days I was studying "perf code" and try to dump some debug
> info in event_sched_out(): kernel/perf_event.c by printk, but found
> system can hang easily.
>
> After digging into related code for several days, I find the hang is
> caused by spinlock deadlock when acquiring rq->lock in task_rq_lock(),
> which is called in the path below:
>
> try_to_wake_up<-wake_up_process<-up<-console_unlock<-printk.
>
> I wonder if there are some usage conventions about printk, which says
> explicitly that printk can not by used in some places of kernel. Or does the
> above show that it is a bug of kernel?
>
> If the above is really a limitation of printk, have we other dump functions
> which may be used safely in some places of kernel source code where
> printk is not allowed.
Don't use printk from NMI context, that's never going to work well.
One thing you could to is use trace_printk() and use ftrace to debug
perf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists