[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110325124124.GA31408@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:41:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 APM: delete Linux kernel APM support
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > > Okay, I can delay this way:
> > >
> > > 2.6.39:
> > > feature-removal.txt targets 2.6.42 removal
> > > depend on CONFIG_EXPERT
> > >
> > > 2.6.40, 2.6.41:
> > > WARN once on run-time access
> > >
> > > 2.6.42:
> > > remove.
> >
> > Regardless of removal, i'd suggest a "this code is not supported" kind of
> > WARN() message to the APM code today, into .39 - to see whether it pops up
> > anywhere - and mark it for -stable as well.
> >
> > .42 removal might be too fast, considering the typical release schedule of
> > Linux distributions. [...]
>
> Anyway, i'd ack this schedule if you queued up the WARN() today with a -stable
> tag, on the condition that if we get complaints about that message, we keep APM
> support.
s/today/for .39
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists