[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhvxO=5GOenagc=F2hyzt-7yLSgDhQbWVuffsD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:40:57 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Cc: linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Toshiharu Okada <toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for
63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Tomoya MORINAGA
<tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com> wrote:
> Hi Sedat,
>
> We have used this DMA driver(include this patch) on linux-2.6.35/37.
> However I haven't seen the issue yet.
>
> I want to know more information.
> Do you mean that it takes 63 more seconds for boot-completing
> when using this patch and pch_dma is integrated as built-in ?
>
> Thanks,
> -----------------------------------------
> Tomoya MORINAGA
> OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
>
I jumped back to the kernel from which I thought it was making
problems and run it several hours.
Unfortunately, I haven't seen any call-traces in the syslogs like before.
So, I could reproduce the errors.
I am sorry for the noise abd will have an eye on the issue.
( So, reverting the patch did not really helped. )
- Sedat -
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sedat Dilek [mailto:sedat.dilek@...glemail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:10 AM
>> To: linux-next; LKML
>> Cc: Stephen Rothwell; Randy Dunlap; Vinod Koul; Tomoya MORINAGA
>> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup
>> - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists