[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110325155356.GG1922@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:53:56 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, fweisbec@...il.com,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] tracing - avoid soft lockup in trace_pipe
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:49:37AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 12:05 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > right, I'm now able to trigger the issue when running setting the tracing
> > as said in the patch and plus running this in few instacies:
> >
> > (while [ 1 ]; do find / > /dev/null ; done) &
>
> That didn't work for me either. But if I run hackbench 50 on the box,
> then the trace does hang while it is running.
>
> >
> > It's strange I did not need this last time.. not sure why :)
> >
> >
> > anyway, the original reproducer I picked this issue from is ltp suite:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/ltp/files/LTP%20Source/ltp-20100131/ltp-full-20100131.tgz/download
> >
> > and running following test:
> > ltp-full-20101031/testcases/kernel/tracing/ftrace_stress_test/ftrace_stress_test.sh
> >
> > reproduces the issue all the time for me, and the patch fixies it.
> > Attaching patch rebased to the current master with changed comment.
>
> Thanks, I'll queue it up for 2.6.40, as I do not think this is that
> critical of a bug.
great, thanks
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists