[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110325180156.GC19214@dirshya.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:31:57 +0530
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, peterz@...radead.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 5/5] cpuidle: cpuidle driver for apm
* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> [2011-03-25 03:24:24]:
>
> > Maybe there is some other way to handle asymmetry ??
>
> When somebody invents a system that needs asymmetry on purpose,
> that is the time to get fancy. Until that day, simply print a
> FW_BUG WARNING and fall back to default_idle().
We may print a warning but not switch to default_idle(). There could
be laptops that gets an extra C-State when run on battery. So when
the ACPI _PPC event happens for the C-State change, we need to handle
the situation such that the states are refreshed for all CPUs in one step.
Basically while we are updating the new C-State, the framework should
not detect this as asymmetric and switch to default_idle(). Please
fell free to suggest a more elegant solution to handle the runtime
C-State change event, though symmetric across all CPUs.
--Vaidy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists