[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110325185824.GE14328@thinkpad-t410>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:58:24 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vojtech@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] eeepc-wmi: Add support for T101MT Home/Express Gate
key
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:03:33AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > So, would the following make sense (KEY_TBD is may abbreviation for "key
> > to be determinded"):
> >
> > - On press (0xe4), send KEY_TBD, value = 1
> > - On hold (0xea), send KEY_TBD, value = 2
> > - On release (0xe5), send KEY_TBD, value = 0
>
> Yes.
There's a little problem with this. The driver uses sparse-keymap, which
calls input_report_key(), which is doing this:
input_event(dev, EV_KEY, code, !!value);
I don't see the hold events in userspace, so they must be getting
dropped as duplicates as you suggested.
I'm not sure who is at fault here. Should input_report_key() not be
forcing value to 0 or 1? Or should sparse-keymap be calling
input_event() directly? Or is sparse-keymap the wrong tool for handling
keys this way?
Thanks,
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists