lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinqbLShaVGL6NJCMamHNWzMGT7DLXb7OQ6dxLVX@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:12:01 -0700
From:	Jeffrey Brown <jeffbrown@...roid.com>
To:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] input: evdev: Indicate buffer overrun with SYN_DROPPED.

Hi Henrik,

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se> wrote:
> My last comment was not right, the SYN_DROPPED is pushed ahead in the
> buffer, sorry about that. However, this change does not shrink the
> number of buffered elements in case of an overrun, which has been
> discussed before as a possibly important feature of the current
> code. I would be more comfortable prepending the head with a
> SYN_DROPPED, like this:
>
> if (client->head == client->tail) {
>        struct input_event drop;
>
>        drop.time = event->time;
>        drop.type = EV_SYN;
>        drop.code = SYN_DROPPED;
>        drop.value = 0;
>        client->buffer[client->head++] = drop;
>        client->head &= client->bufsize - 1;
>
>        client->buffer[client->head++] = *event;
>        client->head &= client->bufsize - 1;
> }
>
> The main point is that if we end up having to drop an event, it is
> likely we will have to drop the next one, too.

I think that's a good idea.  If the client is far behind then we might
as well truncate the buffer as you suggest.  I'll do that.

Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ