linux-kernel - [12/55] mm: swap: unlock swapfile inode mutex before closing file on bad swapfiles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110325234840.165573424@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:47:05 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: [12/55] mm: swap: unlock swapfile inode mutex before closing file on bad swapfiles

2.6.37-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

commit 52c50567d8ab0a0a87f12cceaa4194967854f0bd upstream.

If an administrator tries to swapon a file backed by NFS, the inode mutex is
taken (as it is for any swapfile) but later identified to be a bad swapfile
due to the lack of bmap and tries to cleanup. During cleanup, an attempt is
made to close the file but with inode->i_mutex still held. Closing an NFS
file syncs it which tries to acquire the inode mutex leading to deadlock. If
lockdep is enabled the following appears on the console;

    =============================================
    [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
    2.6.38-rc8-autobuild #1
    ---------------------------------------------
    swapon/2192 is trying to acquire lock:
     (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: vfs_fsync_range+0x47/0x7c

    but task is already holding lock:
     (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: sys_swapon+0x28d/0xae7

    other info that might help us debug this:
    1 lock held by swapon/2192:
     #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: sys_swapon+0x28d/0xae7

    stack backtrace:
    Pid: 2192, comm: swapon Not tainted 2.6.38-rc8-autobuild #1
    Call Trace:
        __lock_acquire+0x2eb/0x1623
        find_get_pages_tag+0x14a/0x174
        pagevec_lookup_tag+0x25/0x2e
        vfs_fsync_range+0x47/0x7c
        lock_acquire+0xd3/0x100
        vfs_fsync_range+0x47/0x7c
        nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xdf [nfs]
        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x2b1
        vfs_fsync_range+0x47/0x7c
        vfs_fsync_range+0x47/0x7c
        vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
        nfs_file_flush+0x64/0x69 [nfs]
        filp_close+0x43/0x72
        sys_swapon+0xa39/0xae7
        sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
        system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

This patch releases the mutex if its held before calling filep_close()
so swapon fails as expected without deadlock when the swapfile is backed
by NFS.  If accepted for 2.6.39, it should also be considered a -stable
candidate for 2.6.38 and 2.6.37.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 mm/swapfile.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -2146,8 +2146,13 @@ bad_swap_2:
 	p->flags = 0;
 	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 	vfree(swap_map);
-	if (swap_file)
+	if (swap_file) {
+		if (did_down) {
+			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+			did_down = 0;
+		}
 		filp_close(swap_file, NULL);
+	}
 out:
 	if (page && !IS_ERR(page)) {
 		kunmap(page);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/