| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110326034210.GX2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:42:10 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: sedat.dilek@...il.com Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?) On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:42:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Paul E. McKenney > >> > <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:55:16AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:05:33PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> >>> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Sedat Dilek > >> >>> > <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > right after I have finished building a new linux-next kernel, booting > >> >>> > > into desktop and archiving my build-tree (ext4) as tarball to an > >> >>> > > external USB harddisk (partition there is ext3). > >> >>> > > ( Yesterday, I have seen similiar call-traces in my logs, but it was > >> >>> > > hard to reproduce [1]. ) > >> >>> > > I am unsure from where the problem aroses, if you have a hint, let me know. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Regards, > >> >>> > > - Sedat - > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/24/268 > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > P.S.: Attached are the dmesg outputs and my kernel-config > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > I turned off the notebook for about 2hrs to avoid thermal problems and > >> >>> > hoax reports. > >> >>> > Jumped into desktop and started an archive job as 1st job while doing daily job. > >> >>> > Yeah, it is reproducible. > >> >>> [...] > >> >>> > [ 212.453822] EXT3-fs (sdb5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode > >> >>> > [ 273.224044] INFO: rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU 0 (t=15000 jiffies) > >> >>> > >> >>> 15000 jiffies matches this 60-second gap, assuming you use HZ=250. > >> >>> > >> >>> > [ 273.224059] sending NMI to all CPUs: > >> >>> > [ 273.224074] NMI backtrace for cpu 0 > >> >>> > [ 273.224081] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd bnep rfcomm bluetooth aes_i586 aes_generic binfmt_misc ppdev acpi_cpufreq mperf cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_userspace lp cpufreq_stats cpufreq_conservative fuse snd_intel8x0 snd_intel8x0m snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm radeon thinkpad_acpi snd_seq_midi pcmcia ttm snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event drm_kms_helper yenta_socket snd_seq pcmcia_rsrc drm pcmcia_core joydev snd_timer snd_seq_device snd i2c_algo_bit tpm_tis shpchp i2c_i801 tpm nsc_ircc irda snd_page_alloc soundcore pci_hotplug rng_core i2c_core tpm_bios psmouse crc_ccitt nvram parport_pc pcspkr parport evdev battery video ac processor power_supply serio_raw button arc4 ecb ath5k ath mac80211 cfg80211 rfkill autofs4 ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod usbhid hid usb_storage uas sg sd_mod sr_mod crc_t10dif cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore scsi_mod thermal e1000 thermal_sys floppy [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > >> >>> > [ 273.224367] > >> >>> > [ 273.224377] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.38-next20110325-2-686-iniza #1 IBM 2374SG6/2374SG6 > >> >>> > [ 273.224397] EIP: 0060:[<c11514f0>] EFLAGS: 00000807 CPU: 0 > >> >>> > [ 273.224414] EIP is at delay_tsc+0x16/0x5e > >> >>> > [ 273.224424] EAX: 00090d42 EBX: 00002710 ECX: c133faf5 EDX: 00090d41 > >> >>> > [ 273.224435] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00090d42 EBP: f5819e9c ESP: f5819e8c > >> >>> > [ 273.224445] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 > >> >>> > [ 273.224458] Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=f5818000 task=c13e3fa0 task.ti=c13b6000) > >> >>> > [ 273.224466] Stack: > >> >>> > [ 273.224472] 00090d41 00002710 c13ee580 c13ee600 f5819ea4 c115149f f5819eac c11514bb > >> >>> > [ 273.224497] f5819eb8 c1016532 c13ee580 f5819ed4 c1078dc1 c134e61e c134e6c2 00000000 > >> >>> > [ 273.224520] 00003a98 f5c03488 f5819ee8 c1078e36 00000000 00000000 c13e3fa0 f5819ef4 > >> >>> > [ 273.224544] Call Trace: > >> >>> > [ 273.224559] [<c115149f>] __delay+0x9/0xb > >> >>> > [ 273.224571] [<c11514bb>] __const_udelay+0x1a/0x1c > >> >>> > [ 273.224590] [<c1016532>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x50/0x62 > >> >>> > [ 273.224608] [<c1078dc1>] check_cpu_stall+0x58/0xb8 > >> >>> > [ 273.224622] [<c1078e36>] __rcu_pending+0x15/0xc4 > >> >>> > [ 273.224637] [<c10791df>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x6d/0x93 > >> >>> > [ 273.224652] [<c1039c6c>] update_process_times+0x2d/0x58 > >> >>> > [ 273.224666] [<c10509e9>] tick_sched_timer+0x6b/0x9a > >> >>> > [ 273.224682] [<c1047196>] __run_hrtimer+0x9c/0x111 > >> >>> > [ 273.224694] [<c105097e>] ? tick_sched_timer+0x0/0x9a > >> >>> > [ 273.224708] [<c1047b38>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd6/0x1bb > >> >>> > [ 273.224727] [<c104fca1>] tick_do_broadcast.constprop.4+0x38/0x6a > >> >>> > [ 273.224741] [<c104fd80>] tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0xad/0xe1 > >> >>> > [ 273.224757] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.224772] [<c1004215>] timer_interrupt+0x15/0x1c > >> >>> > [ 273.224785] [<c107536d>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4e/0x164 > >> >>> > [ 273.224799] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.224811] [<c10754b9>] handle_irq_event+0x36/0x51 > >> >>> > [ 273.224824] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.224837] [<c1076d0f>] handle_level_irq+0x4d/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.224845] <IRQ> > >> >>> > [ 273.224857] [<c1003b8d>] ? do_IRQ+0x35/0x80 > >> >>> > [ 273.224871] [<c12ac0f0>] ? common_interrupt+0x30/0x38 > >> >>> > [ 273.224886] [<c10400d8>] ? destroy_worker+0x52/0x6c > >> >>> > [ 273.224922] [<f87b730f>] ? arch_local_irq_enable+0x5/0xb [processor] > >> >>> > [ 273.224947] [<f87b7ef5>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x100/0x138 [processor] > >> >>> > [ 273.224964] [<c11ebd92>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xc2/0x137 > >> >>> > [ 273.224978] [<c1001da3>] ? cpu_idle+0x89/0xa3 > >> >>> > [ 273.224995] [<c128c26c>] ? rest_init+0x58/0x5a > >> >>> > [ 273.225008] [<c1418722>] ? start_kernel+0x315/0x31a > >> >>> > [ 273.225022] [<c14180a2>] ? i386_start_kernel+0xa2/0xaa > >> >>> > [ 273.225029] Code: e5 e8 d6 ff ff ff 5d c3 55 89 e5 8d 04 80 e8 c9 ff ff ff 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 89 c7 56 53 52 64 8b 35 04 20 47 c1 8d 76 00 0f ae e8 <e8> 6b ff ff ff 89 c3 8d 76 00 0f ae e8 e8 5e ff ff ff 89 c2 29 > >> >>> > [ 273.225154] Call Trace: > >> >>> > [ 273.225166] [<c115149f>] __delay+0x9/0xb > >> >>> > [ 273.225178] [<c11514bb>] __const_udelay+0x1a/0x1c > >> >>> > [ 273.225192] [<c1016532>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x50/0x62 > >> >>> > [ 273.225207] [<c1078dc1>] check_cpu_stall+0x58/0xb8 > >> >>> > [ 273.225220] [<c1078e36>] __rcu_pending+0x15/0xc4 > >> >>> > [ 273.225234] [<c10791df>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x6d/0x93 > >> >>> > [ 273.225247] [<c1039c6c>] update_process_times+0x2d/0x58 > >> >>> > [ 273.225260] [<c10509e9>] tick_sched_timer+0x6b/0x9a > >> >>> > [ 273.225274] [<c1047196>] __run_hrtimer+0x9c/0x111 > >> >>> > [ 273.225286] [<c105097e>] ? tick_sched_timer+0x0/0x9a > >> >>> > [ 273.225300] [<c1047b38>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd6/0x1bb > >> >>> > [ 273.225316] [<c104fca1>] tick_do_broadcast.constprop.4+0x38/0x6a > >> >>> > [ 273.225330] [<c104fd80>] tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0xad/0xe1 > >> >>> > [ 273.225345] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.225358] [<c1004215>] timer_interrupt+0x15/0x1c > >> >>> > [ 273.225370] [<c107536d>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4e/0x164 > >> >>> > [ 273.225384] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.225396] [<c10754b9>] handle_irq_event+0x36/0x51 > >> >>> > [ 273.225409] [<c1076cc2>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.225421] [<c1076d0f>] handle_level_irq+0x4d/0x63 > >> >>> > [ 273.225429] <IRQ> [<c1003b8d>] ? do_IRQ+0x35/0x80 > >> >>> > [ 273.225450] [<c12ac0f0>] ? common_interrupt+0x30/0x38 > >> >>> > [ 273.225464] [<c10400d8>] ? destroy_worker+0x52/0x6c > >> >>> > [ 273.225493] [<f87b730f>] ? arch_local_irq_enable+0x5/0xb [processor] > >> >>> > [ 273.225517] [<f87b7ef5>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x100/0x138 [processor] > >> >>> > [ 273.225532] [<c11ebd92>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xc2/0x137 > >> >>> > [ 273.225545] [<c1001da3>] ? cpu_idle+0x89/0xa3 > >> >>> > [ 273.225559] [<c128c26c>] ? rest_init+0x58/0x5a > >> >>> > [ 273.225571] [<c1418722>] ? start_kernel+0x315/0x31a > >> >>> > [ 273.225584] [<c14180a2>] ? i386_start_kernel+0xa2/0xaa > >> >>> > >> >>> Interesting. Looks like RCU detected a stall while the CPU sits in > >> >>> cpu_idle. That *shouldn't* happen... > >> >> > >> >> There have been a few of these things recently that turned out to > >> >> be BIOS misconfigurations, though that would not be the first thing > >> >> I would suspect if the system had run other versions successfully. > >> >> Another possibility is that the CPU spent the full time in interrupt. > >> >> Get an interrupt from the idle loop, stay in interrupt for 60 seconds, > >> >> get an RCU CPU stall warning. > >> >> > >> >> Or I could have somehow inserted a bug in RCU. But I am not seeing > >> >> this in my testing. > >> >> > >> >> Thanx, Paul > >> >> > >> > > >> > The problems started when I first saw CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60 > >> > in my configs. > >> > > >> > This an old IBM T40p notebook with Pentium-M (Banias) UP processor. > >> > IIRC I have flashed the latest BIOS available for this notebook. > >> > > >> > [ 11.786073] thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad BIOS 1RETDRWW (3.23 ), EC 1RHT71WW-3.04 > >> > [ 11.786111] thinkpad_acpi: IBM ThinkPad T40p, model 2374SG6 > >> > > >> > As I am still sitting in the dark, it would be very helpful to know if > >> > I can play with HZ or RCU kernel-config parameters. > >> > Can I change RCU behaviour from user-space? > >> > > >> > - Sedat - > >> > > >> > P.S.: Note to myself: Read Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt & check > >> > possible values in lib/Kconfig.debug > >> > > >> > >> OK, I had a deeper look at the RCU (STALL) kernel-configs. > >> > >> $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110323-3-686-iniza | grep STALL > >> # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set > >> > >> $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110324-2-686-iniza | grep STALL > >> # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set > >> > >> $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110325-2-686-iniza | grep STALL > >> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60 > > > > Yep, you moved from a kernel version that had the stall detected disabled > > by default to one that enables it by default. > > > > But -next has had stall detection enabled by default for a good > > long time now. > > > >> With my todays (next-20110325) linux-next kernel I cannot work! > >> The yesterday call-traces could be indeed a different issue (I am > >> currently testing with the 2 patches from block-tree [1]). > >> > >> Now, I am building a new linux-next kernel with CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y as > >> recommended in Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt file. > > > > You had CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y earlier? Tiny RCU does not have > > a stall detector. > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > >> - Sedat - > >> > >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/25/326 > > > > No, and I have here SMP configured. > Yesterday's RCU and SMP kernel config settings: > > # egrep '_RCU|RCU_|_SMP' /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110324-2-686-iniza > CONFIG_X86_32_SMP=y > CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y > # CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is not set > # CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set > CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=32 > # CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT is not set > CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y > # CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE is not set > CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y > CONFIG_SMP=y > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP=y > CONFIG_HAVE_TEXT_POKE_SMP=y > CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_HOST_SMP=y > # CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER is not set > # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set > # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set > > IIRC Tiny RCU and SMP bite each other? > So, what do you recommend for an UP processor machine? If you want RCU stall warnings, or if you are building an SMP kernel, it has to be either TREE_RCU or TREE_PREEMPT_RCU. If you are on UP and don't care about RCU stall warnings, then either TINY_RCU or TINY_PREEMPT_RCU will work fine. I just saw your "Now, I am building a new linux-next kernel with CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y" and thought that you were hinting that you had been running with something other than TREE_RCU. > - Sedat - > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists