linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinu4Piaz5SAb4BmMi-Yd6OjRAKYyKpcEWmD0THU@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:34:09 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 09:25, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> On 2011-03-26 08:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 07:29, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-25 22:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:43, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jens Axboe (20):
>>>>>      block: remove per-queue plugging
>>>>
>>>> This one (commit 7eaceaccab5f40bbfda044629a6298616aeaed50) breaks IDE
>>>> on Atari/m68k under ARAnyM. It hangs on:
>>>>
>>>> | ide: Falcon IDE controller
>>>> | Probing IDE interface ide0...
>>>> | hda: Sarge m68k, ATA DISK drive
>>>> | ide0 at 0xfff00000 on irq 15 (serialized)
>>>> | ide-gd driver 1.18
>>>> | hda: max request size: 128KiB
>>>> | hda: 2118816 sectors (1084 MB) w/256KiB Cache, CHS=2102/16/63
>>>>
>>>> The next expected line is the partition parsing:
>>>>
>>>> | hda: AHDI hda1 hda2
>>>
>>> Geert, does this work for you?
>>
>> Yep.Thanks!
>
> Great! I think we should place those blk_delay_queue() calls under the
> if (rq), that should workd to and be more optimal. Can I ask you to
> check that, too?
>
> So:
>
> if (rq) {
>        blk_requeue_request(q, rq);
>        blk_delay_queue(q, msecs_to_jiffies(3));
> }
>
> in both locations.

Works, too.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/