[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikqHWid2Q93F5U5Qw5snJH8C5PXoa7J6=6hYO94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:22:55 +0530
From: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus()
The interval for checking scheduling domains if they are due to be
balanced currently depends on boot state NR_CPUS, which may not
accurately reflect the number of online CPUs at the time of check.
Signed-off-by: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3f7ec9e..c7ec5c8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
/*
* Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3850,8 +3851,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum
cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval);
if (unlikely(!interval))
interval = 1;
- if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10)
- interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10;
+ if (interval > HZ*num_online_cpus()/10)
+ interval = HZ*num_online_cpus()/10;
need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
--
1.7.0.4
Sisir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists