[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301216279.15393.9.camel@debian>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:57:59 +0300
From: Maksym Planeta <mcsim.planeta@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: page: get_order() optimization
On Wed, 23/03/2011 at 11:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok, that's certainly a nice optimization.
Thanks, I rewrote patch according to your observations.
> One detail: in many cases 'size' is a constant. Have you checked recent GCC,
> does it turn the generic version of get_order() into a loop even for constants,
> or is it able does it perhaps recognize the pattern and precompute the result?
Yes, gcc precomputes the result, so I added case for constants.
> With no #ifdefs in get_order().
And removed #ifdefs from get_order().
--
Thanks,
Maksym Planeta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists