lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D0A93FED-2522-44DA-830D-C86E21D68B4F@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:15:12 -0400
From:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:	Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Revert NFSROOT default mount options


On Mar 28, 2011, at 1:09 AM, Belisko Marek wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
>> Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...il.com> reports that recent attempts
>> to fix regressions in NFSROOT have broken his configuration:
>> 
>>> After update from 2.6.38-rc8 to 2.6.38 is mounting rootfs over nfs not possible.
>>> Log:
>>> VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) on device 0:14.
>>> Freeing init memory: 132K
>>> nfs: server 10.146.1.21 not responding, still trying
>>> nfs: server 10.146.1.21 not responding, still trying
>>> 
>>> This is never ending. I make short bisect (not too much commits
>>> between versions)
>>> and bad commit was reported: 53d4737580535e073963b91ce87d4216e434fab5
>>> 
>>> NFS: NFSROOT should default to "proto=udp"
>>> 
>>> I've tested on mini2440 board (DM9000, static IP).
>>> Is there some missing option or something else to be checked?
>> 
>> An examination of a network trace captured during the failure shows
>> that the mount is actually succeeding, but that the client is not
>> seeing READ replies larger than 16KB.
>> 
>> Last fall we removed the ad hoc mount option parser in fs/nfs/nfsroot.c
>> in favor of using the main parser in fs/nfs/super.c (see commit
>> 56463e50 "NFS: Use super.c for NFSROOT mount option parsing").  That
>> commit changed the default NFSROOT mount options to be the same as
>> those employed by user space mounts.  As it turns out, that change is
>> not tolerated by many embedded systems.
>> 
>> Subsequently, commit 53d47375 introduced a clean way to specify
>> default mount options for NFSROOT, so we can restore the traditional
>> defaults for NFSROOT easily now:
>> 
>>   vers=2,udp,rsize=4096,wsize=4096
>> 
>> This should revert the changed default NFSROOT mount options
>> introduced with commit 56463e50.
> Work fine with below patch.
> You can add my Tested by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com>

Will do, thanks for your testing.

>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> 
>> Hi-
>> 
>> Please test this, as I no longer have an NFSROOT rig here.
>> 
>> Can some responsible maintainer type see that this gets into
>> linux-next quickly for broader testing?
>> 
>>  fs/nfs/nfsroot.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfsroot.c b/fs/nfs/nfsroot.c
>> index c541093..c4744e1 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfsroot.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfsroot.c
>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
>>  #define NFS_ROOT               "/tftpboot/%s"
>> 
>>  /* Default NFSROOT mount options. */
>> -#define NFS_DEF_OPTIONS                "udp"
>> +#define NFS_DEF_OPTIONS                "vers=2,udp,rsize=4096,wsize=4096"
>> 
>>  /* Parameters passed from the kernel command line */
>>  static char nfs_root_parms[256] __initdata = "";
>> 
>> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> marek
> 
> -- 
> as simple and primitive as possible
> -------------------------------------------------
> Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
> Freelance Developer
> 
> Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
> Tel: +421 915 052 184
> skype: marekwhite
> icq: 290551086
> web: http://open-nandra.com

-- 
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ