linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mach-ux500: Add CG2900 devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110328141237.GB19350@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:12:37 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <par-gunnar.p.hjalmdahl@...ricsson.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@...y.com>,
	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Lukasz Rymanowski <Lukasz.Rymanowski@...to.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <pghatwork@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mach-ux500: Add CG2900 devices

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2011, Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c
> > index d8e5a52..16b7343 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c
> > @@ -417,6 +417,8 @@ static void __init mop500_init_machine(void)
> >  
> >         platform_device_register(&ab8500_device);
> >  
> > +       cg2900_init_board();
> > +
> >         i2c_register_board_info(0, mop500_i2c0_devices,
> >                                 ARRAY_SIZE(mop500_i2c0_devices));
> >         i2c_register_board_info(2, mop500_i2c2_devices,
> 
> Not exactly what I had in mind, but probably good enough for a start.
> This adds a dependency from core code to the staging driver now,
> which shouldn't be there. I suppose we can add
> 
> "Clean up device registration path to register the main device from board code"
>  
> to the TODO file.

No, please do not make any core code dependant on a staging driver, this
isn't ok, it needs to be stand-alone, or at the least, the rest of the
kernel needs to be able to be built with no staging drivers enabled.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/