[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <72a7cb0d5ec0acfb1e9c008e0a5ccb8fa078803a.1301324270.git.luto@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:46 -0400
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] x86-64: Turn off -pg and turn on -foptimize-sibling-calls for vDSO
The vDSO isn't part of the kernel, so profiling and kernel
backtraces don't really matter.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
---
This might need a cc-option check for -foptimize-sibling-calls.
arch/x86/vdso/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile
index b6552b1..7b6df84 100644
--- a/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile
@@ -37,11 +37,24 @@ $(obj)/%.so: OBJCOPYFLAGS := -S
$(obj)/%.so: $(obj)/%.so.dbg FORCE
$(call if_changed,objcopy)
+#
+# Don't omit frame pointers for ease of userspace debugging, but do
+# optimize sibling calls.
+#
CFL := $(PROFILING) -mcmodel=small -fPIC -O2 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -m64 \
- $(filter -g%,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+ $(filter -g%,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) \
+ -fno-omit-frame-pointer -foptimize-sibling-calls
$(vobjs): KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(CFL)
+#
+# vDSO code runs in userspace and -pg doesn't help with profiling anyway.
+#
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_vdso-note.o = -pg
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_vclock_gettime.o = -pg
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgetcpu.o = -pg
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_vvar.o = -pg
+
targets += vdso-syms.lds
obj-$(VDSO64-y) += vdso-syms.lds
--
1.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists