[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103282329.04184.nai.xia@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:29:03 +0800
From: Nai Xia <nai.xia@...il.com>
To: Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages
On Monday 28 March 2011 22:59:02 Izik Eidus wrote:
> On 03/28/2011 04:14 PM, Nai Xia wrote:
> > Currently, ksm uses page checksum to detect volatile pages. Izik Eidus
> > suggested that we could use pte dirty bit to optimize. This patch series
> > adds this new logic.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> One small note:
> When kvm will use ksm on intel cpu with extended page tables support,
> the cpu won`t track
> dirty bit, therefore the calc_hash() logic should be used in such cases
> (untill intel will fadd this support in their cpus)...
>
> Moreover I think that even though that AMD nested page tables does
> update dirty bit, you still need
> to sync it with the host page table using mmu notifiers ?
>
> (Not that on regular application use case of ksm any of this should be
> an issue)
>
>
Hmm, I will consider these two issues in the next version. Thanks for
input!
Nai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists