[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110328092329.6e5ac682@jbarnes-desktop>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:23:29 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:22:13 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:03:26 +0100
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up
> > > > those range on system that have lots of RAM.
> > > >
> > > > Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation.
> > > >
> > > > So We could remove those not needed code now.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 2 -
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 64 ---------------------------------------------
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1
> > > > 3 files changed, 67 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Cc:-ing Jesse - i suspect this should be handled by the PCI tree.
> >
> > Please re-send, sounds good in theory but I'd like to see the patch.
>
> It should be in your lkml folder, the first mail in this thread has the patch.
If I kept everything in my lkml folder maybe... :)
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists