[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110328025935.GG12596@qtel.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:59:35 +0800
From: Lu Guanqun <guanqun.lu@...el.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@...el.com>,
"meego-kernel@...ts.meego.com" <meego-kernel@...ts.meego.com>,
"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Fu, Michael" <michael.fu@...el.com>,
"Wang, Xingchao" <xingchao.wang@...el.com>,
"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"Kp, Jeeja" <jeeja.kp@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jekyll Lai <jekyll_lai@...tron.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] mrst: export get_gpio_by_name() function
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:47:23AM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 3/27/2011 7:47 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:34:22 +0800
> > Arjan van de Ven<arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/27/2011 7:29 PM, Lu Guanqun wrote:
> >>> Export get_gpio_by_name() function and make its name more focused.
> >>> We are doing this because currently get_gpio_by_name() is only used
> >>> by the devices exported from SFI DEVS table, but it is also useful
> >>> for other PCI devices which also use the GPIO lines, and have their
> >>> gpio infos in the SFI GPIO table.
> >>>
> >> I can't say that I like the new name... at all.
> >>
> >> what's "mid" ?
> >> what is wrong with the original name????
> >>
> > Hi Arjan,
> >
> > The original get_gpio_by_name() is static and only used in mrst.c as it's
> > mrst/mfld specific. So if we call it from a PCI driver, that name sounds
>
> get_gpio_by_name() would be a very good generic name for a function
> provided by the gpio layer as well.
>
> > like a platform independent general API while it's actually mrst/mfld bound.
> > So we would show this dependency from the function name.
> that makes no sense.
> and again, what on earth is a "mid"??????????
>
MID stands for mobile internet device.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Internet_device
--
guanqun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists