linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM:a bug about pi-futex maybe let the program going to hang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110328171640.GB8529@home.goodmis.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:16:40 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	scxby <scxby@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM:a bug about pi-futex maybe let the program going to
 hang

Thanks for the report, I added Cc to people that may be able to help.

-- Steve

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:19:03PM +0800, scxby wrote:
> hi, all.
>  
>   Maybe, there is a bug about pi-futex, it would let the program in user-space going to hang.
>  
>   We have a board: CPU is powerpc 8572, two core. after ran one month, the state of pi-futex in user-space got bad: mutex->__data.__lock is 0x8000023e, mutex->__data.__count is 0, mutex->__data.__owner is 0.
>  
>   then, I review file "kernel/funtex.c"(the version is linux 2.6.38), found a case:
>  
>   if there are 3 thread, named threadA, threadB, threadC??thread A hold mutexM, threadB and threadC is waiting mutexM. They run as fllow steps:
>  
>   1. threadB and threadC sleep at line 1984.
>   2. threadB receive a signal, then it will be wake up.
>   3. threadA unlock mutexM, and give mutexM to threadB. 
>   4. threadB call fixup_owner, try to give mutex to threadC.
>   5. at line 1580, threadB trigger a addr-fault, then goto handle_fault.
>   6. at line 1617, threadB release spinlock, then handle fault.
>   7. threadC got spinlock, and call fixup_owner, and got mutexM.
>   8. threadC give mutexM to threadB.
>   9. threadB re-got spinlock, it will found "pi_state->owner == oldowner" and retry to fixup.
>   10. threadB give mutexM to threadC, that's a bad thing.
>  
>   we have wrote a program, this program can prove all above

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/