[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1e0kn8uS6Hmz3y4kbCOGGKYpB+LU-vS2qsfKK@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:41:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Commit 9661e92c10a9775243c1ecb73373528ed8725a10: sysfs: cannot
create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0/device'
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Alessandro Suardi
<alessandro.suardi@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, yes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/668351/
>
> Works on top of my -git18 + (unrelated) LVDS detection patch, thanks.
>
> Tested-by: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...il.com>
Ok, which tree should this go through? I see from patchworks that it
was sent to linux-acpi and lkml, but the commit it fixes actually came
through Andrew.
Should I just take it directly?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists