[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D90D255.4060008@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:24:21 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apm: orphan the driver
On 03/28/2011 11:21 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Or we phase out the APM effort by only supporting it for poweroff, for
>> example.
>
> Phasing out APM idle at least would be reasonable. resumably even if the old
> laptops still work they are likely on AC because their batteries have
> long died. So using a bit more power in idle shouldn't be a big
> issue.
>
> Not sure about suspend, screen saver etc. I suppose those could
> be kept as frozen legacy features. At least until someone else
> wants to redesign those parts too.
>
Since poweroff applies even to stationary systems, it's probably the
most important bit. Suspend/resume the second most important.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists